Skip to content

feat: log management #3188

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

feat: log management #3188

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

feat: log management

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jun 4, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jun 4, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment


return run

return inner
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided Python code defines several helper functions and a decorator to record audit logs. Here's an analysis of its content:

Helper Functions:

  1. _get_ip_address(request)

    • Retrieves the IP address from the request metadata, prioritizing HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR if available.
  2. _get_user(request)

    • Attempts to retrieve user information using request.user. If no user is found, it returns an empty dictionary.
  3. _get_details(request)

    • Extracts path, body, and query parameters from the request and returns them in a dictionary format.

Decorator Function (log):

  • Parameters:

    • menu: The menu item under which this action was performed.

    • operate: A string representation or function that describes what was done by the operator. The function can accept request as input and should return a string indicating the operation or error message.

    • Optional arguments like _get_user, _get_ip_address, _get_details, and _get_operation_object.

  • Inner Function run(view, request, **kwargs):

    • Executes the view associated with the request and catches exceptions to handle errors gracefully.
    • Logs the details including menu, operation description, status, IP address, additional details, user info, and optionally fetched object.
    • Saves the logging entry into the Log model defined in the imported module.

Potential Issues:

  1. Lack of Input Validation:

    • There's no input validation for important fields such as menu, operate, etc. This could lead to bugs where invalid inputs might result in unexpected behavior or security vulnerabilities.
  2. Error Handling:

    • The current implementation does not explicitly catch certain exceptions (e.g., database related) which might be raised during the execution of the decorated function.
    • It would be beneficial to include more robust error handling to ensure the application doesn't crash unexpectedly due to unhandled exceptions in views.
  3. Code Reusability:

    • The current design allows for flexibility but introduces complexity in understanding and maintaining different use cases when multiple decorators are nested or composed.
  4. Security Concerns:

    • Directly retrieving sensitive information like email addresses from the user without verifying its correctness raises concerns about potential data exposure risks.
  5. Performance Considerations:

    • Inserting records directly into a database in every successful API call adds some overhead; this will need evaluation based on expected load levels.

Optimization Suggestions:

  1. Input Validation and Error Handling:

    • Add comprehensive checks to verify that all necessary parameters are provided before processing requests.
    • Enhance exception handling logic to manage common errors and prevent crashes.
  2. Decomposition of Code:

    • Ensure each piece of functionality has minimal dependencies. Breaking down complex operations can make debugging easier.
    • Use modular patterns where practical.
  3. Logging Best Practices:

    • Implement proper logging strategies to track performance metrics (i.e., time taken), success/failure rates of operations per endpoint, and other relevant diagnostics.
    logger.info(f"Operation {operate} by User ID: {user['id']}")
  4. Database Efficiency:

    • Regularly review database schema changes to optimize write-heavy operations.
    • Explore batching writes for improved throughput.

By addressing these considerations, you can enhance both functional stability and performance while ensuring adherence to best practices for production applications.

details = models.JSONField(verbose_name="详情", default=dict, encoder=SystemEncoder)

class Meta:
db_table = "log"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no apparent irregularities or potential issues with the code provided. However, I can suggest a few minor improvements:

  1. Remove Unnecessary Docstrings: Since you're using docstring annotations (@@@coding:utf-8) instead of traditional comments, it would be better to remove the redundant docstrings within the class.

  2. Consistent Naming Style: Ensure that all variable names (e.g., menu, operate, etc.) follow consistent naming conventions if appropriate for your project.

Here's a revised version of the code without unnecessary changes but still follows good practices:

# coding=utf-8
"""
    @project: MaxKB
    @Author:虎虎
    @file: log_management.py
    @date:2025/6/4 14:15
    @desc:
"""

import uuid

from django.db import models

from common.encoder.encoder import SystemEncoder
from common.mixins.app_model_mixin import AppModelMixin


class Log(AppModelMixin):
    """
    审计日志
    """
    id = models.UUIDField(
        primary_key=True,
        max_length=128,
        default=uuid.uuid1,
        editable=False,
        verbose_name="主键id"
    )

    menu = models.CharField(max_length=128, verbose_name="操作菜单")

    operate = models.CharField(max_length=128, verbose_name="操作")

    operation_object = models.JSONField(
        verbose_name="操作对象",
        default=dict,
        encoder=SystemEncoder
    )

    user = models.JSONField(verbose_name="用户信息", default=dict)

    status = models.IntegerField(verbose_name="状态")

    ip_address = models.CharField(max_length=128, verbose_name="ip地址")

    details = models.JSONField(
        verbose_name="详情",
        default=dict,
        encoder=SystemEncoder
    )

    class Meta:
        db_table = "log"

This slight formatting change enhances readability while adhering to typical coding standards.

'db_table': 'log',
},
),
]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code appears to be correctly structured for creating a new model called Log with various fields such as creation time, update time, ID, menu, operation, operation object, user information, status, IP address, and details. The use of UUID for the primary key is appropriate, and default values and encoders are set for JSONField.

However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:

  1. Version Information: Ensure that the database migration file includes version information at the top in accordance with Django's naming convention. For example:

    # Generated by django-migrate on 2025-06-04 06:17 UTC
  2. Comments: Add comments to describe each field and their purpose to improve maintainability.

  3. Validation: Consider adding validation checks for certain fields, especially those dealing with dates (update_time) and JSON data types.

Here’s an updated version of the code incorporating these improvements:

# Generated by django-migrate on 2025-06-04 06:17 UTC

import common.encoder.encoder
import uuid
from django.db import migrations, models


class Migration(migrations.Migration):

    dependencies = [
        ('system_manage', '0003_workspaceuserresourcepermission_and_more'),
    ]

    operations = [
        migrations.CreateModel(
            name='Log',
            fields=[
                (
                    'create_time',
                    models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True,
                                        verbose_name='创建时间'
                                        )
                ),
                (
                    'update_time',
                    models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True,
                                        verbose_name='修改时间')
                ),
                (
                    'id',
                    models.UUIDField(default=uuid.uuid1,
                                    editable=False,
                                    primary_key=True,
                                    serialize=False,
                                    verbose_name='主键id')
                ),
                (
                    'menu',
                    models.CharField(max_length=128,
                                     verbose_name='操作菜单')
                ),
                (
                    'operate',
                    models.CharField(max_length=128,
                                     verbose_name='操作')
                ),
                (
                    'operation_object',
                    models.JSONField(default=dict,
                                      encoder=common.encoder.encoder.SystemEncoder,
                                      verbose_name='操作对象')
                ),
                (
                    'user',
                    models.JSONField(default=dict,
                                      verbose_name='用户信息')
                ),
                (
                    'status',
                    models.IntegerField(verbose_name='状态')
                ),
                (
                    'ip_address',
                    models.CharField(max_length=128,
                                     verbose_name='IP地址')
                ),
                (
                    'details',
                    models.JSONField(default=dict,
                                      encoder=common.encoder.encoder.SystemEncoder,
                                      verbose_name='详情')
                ),
            ],
            options={
                'db_table': 'log',
            },
        ),
    ]

These changes help ensure clarity and correctness in the database schema definition.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v2@feat_log_manage branch June 4, 2025 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant