Skip to content

fix: anonymous authentication #3215

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

fix: anonymous authentication #3215

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: anonymous authentication

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jun 9, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jun 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v2@fix_auth branch June 9, 2025 08:53

def to_string(self):
return encrypt(json.dumps(self.to_dict()))

@staticmethod
def new_instance(authentication: str):
auth = json.loads(decrypt(authentication))
return ChatAuthentication(auth.get('auth_type'), auth.get('is_auth'), auth.get('auth_passed'))
return ChatAuthentication(auth.get('auth_type'))


class ChatUserToken:
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code is generally clean and efficient, but there are a few suggestions for improvement:

  1. Remove Unnecessary Variables: The is_auth and auth_passed properties can be removed since they are not used after initialization.

  • def init(self, auth_type: str | None, is_auth: bool, auth_passed: bool):
  •    self.is_auth = is_auth
    
  •    self.auth_passed = auth_passed
    
  • def init(self, auth_type: str | None):
    self.auth_type = auth_type

2. **Simplify Initialization Logic**: Since `authentication` is only used once and then processed again using `json.loads`, you can directly set the attributes during initialization.

```python
  @staticmethod
  def new_instance(authentication: str):
      auth = json.loads(decrypt(authentication))
-        return ChatAuthentication(auth.get('auth_type'), auth.get('is_auth'), auth.get('auth_passed'))
+        return ChatAuthentication(auth['auth_type'])
  1. Consider Adding Type Annotations: While Python type hints can help with readability and maintainability, they do not enforce at runtime. If performance is critical or correctness matters significantly, consider adding explicit checks or constraints.

These changes simplify the code while maintaining its functionality.

@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ def handle(self, request, token: str, get_token_details):
if application_setting_model is not None:
application_setting = QuerySet(application_setting_model).filter(application_id=application_id).first()
if application_setting.authentication:
raise AppAuthenticationFailed(1002, _('Authentication information is incorrect'))
if 'password' != chat_user_token.authentication.auth_type:
raise AppAuthenticationFailed(1002, _('Authentication information is incorrect'))
return None, ChatAuth(
current_role_list=[RoleConstants.CHAT_ANONYMOUS_USER],
permission_list=[
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is one potential issue with the provided code:

if 'password' != chat_user_token.authentication.auth_type:

This condition does not account for other authentication types. For example, it doesn't check if 'token', 'email_code', or any other valid auth type are used. The code should include checks for all supported authentication methods to ensure robustness.

Optimization suggestions could be:

  1. Use Enum: Define an AuthType enumeration to handle different authentication types more clearly and cleanly.

  2. Dictionary Mapping: Create a dictionary mapping each auth type to their conditions (e.g., {'password': lambda x: True}). This would make it easier to manage and extend when adding new auth types.

  3. Logging: Consider logging which authentication type was attempted upon failure, especially for debugging purposes.

  4. Validation Function: Abstract out the logic related to checking authentication into a separate function that can be reused across multiple parts of your application.

By incorporating these improvements, the code becomes more maintainable and scalable while ensuring that you cover all possible authentication scenarios effectively.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant