-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vertical Raster feature needed #34
Comments
Hi, because of other changes I need, I did the GCode generator completely new, but it now is also possible to change also the scan direction (tab: G-Code, config: Scan image lines ...). If you like you could be my first external tester of this new code. |
Yes, thanks. I am happy to test this.
Did you see my additions of dwell (G4), and scaling the the laser power S?
I find the latter was marginally useful.
Bruce
…On Sat, Jan 8, 2022, 1:53 PM rktech-de ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi, because of other changes I need, I did the GCode generator completely
new, but it now is also possible to change also the scan direction (tab:
G-Code, config: Scan image lines ...). If you like you could be my first
external tester of this new code.
Take a look here: https://github.com/rktech-de/Inkscape
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#34 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJNU5OB2UWIJGHYGSPKUWX3UVCBZBANCNFSM5H76IJ2A>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
First impression - it loads well into inkscape, and the features are
impressive. I'll be busy trying these out (enthusiastically!).
So it is for Inkscape .92 or should it also work for 1.1.? I know I was
having problems with png.py in Inkscape 1.1
Thanks for now, continuing...
Bruce
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 7:40 PM Bruce Chadbourne ***@***.***>
wrote:
… Yes, thanks. I am happy to test this.
Did you see my additions of dwell (G4), and scaling the the laser power S?
I find the latter was marginally useful.
Bruce
On Sat, Jan 8, 2022, 1:53 PM rktech-de ***@***.***> wrote:
> Hi, because of other changes I need, I did the GCode generator completely
> new, but it now is also possible to change also the scan direction (tab:
> G-Code, config: Scan image lines ...). If you like you could be my first
> external tester of this new code.
> Take a look here: https://github.com/rktech-de/Inkscape
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#34 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJNU5OB2UWIJGHYGSPKUWX3UVCBZBANCNFSM5H76IJ2A>
> .
> Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
> <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
> or Android
> <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
>
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
--
Bruce Chadbourne
306 Fern Circle
Lebanon PA 17042
|
it is for inkscape 0.9x, that's the version I'm currently using, I'm sure currently it will not work with 1.x but I will do this if later on, when I know the new GCode generator is working fine. |
if I get you right, the dwell time should be awaited after each scanline. Then this could be added to the "Start of line code" configuration. For example this G-Code configuration: this will create the GCode like this (for a 2mm thick vertical line): G90 G21 Or maybe the "distance for acceleration" setting will help you. This will generate a (short) distance at the beginning and the end of a scan line in the same direction while the laser is switched off. this will allow the machine to accelerate to the Engraving speed, so the energy (gray level) for each dot is constant. It will also prevent the laser be switched on when the g-code parser of your machine already calculate some deceleration and curves when going to the next line. So maybe the G4 is not needed any more with a sufficient distance setting. BR |
Hello,
Here are my comments thus far, in no particular order
1. Comment to self - I am unfamiliar with the M62, 63, 65, 66, 67, 68
digital controls. This may give me additional capability I don't
understand right now - my system is MACH3 with a "simple" Genmitsu 3018-MX3
control board (non GRBL). Please tell me a little about this aspect of
your implementation.
2. Resolution steps - I suggest adding 3,4 pixels per mm (as I did in my
fork) - easily done.. Perhaps also 7 or 8.
3. FLIP X, FLIP Y - the gcode is flipped but not the preview .PNG -
consider the advantage (or confusion, if not doing it)
4. Full Page - with it selected you print everything in the page, as I
expect. With it unselected, you printed objects outside the page boundary,
even though they were not selected. Is this intentional?
5. Scan image lines - I like the feature, and the different options.
However- my 40x48mm test image was oriented at 0,0 at the left bottom
corner. When I selected "Zig zag Y", it started the image at x47 and
finished at x86 - something buggy here. Some of the other options were
also offset to the right.
6. My system presently does not utilize M62...etc. I used the "Power
Level Change Code" field and modified it to use the M03 S command. This
works, however there is no POWER OFF (M5) command found in the code. I
think the laser should be off when traveling(?), such as the 10mm
acceleration zone you have implemented? (Perhaps I need to understand
better).
Thank you, so glad that you are working on this
…--
Bruce Chadbourne
306 Fern Circle
Lebanon PA 17042
|
Hi Bruce, |
Yes, will do that later today.
…On Mon, Jan 10, 2022, 3:17 AM rktech-de ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Now we are talking here about my fork in this foreign repository, could
you please put your comments as separate issues in my fork-repository? THX
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#34 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJNU5OCGCC3Y3FO7CS6ADWLUVKIZ3ANCNFSM5H76IJ2A>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Thank you for your code, which gives me good results. My suggestion - the raster lines run horizontally in the x-direction. When a piece requires me to rotate it 90 degrees in the machine, the raster lines now are vertical which is not always a pleasing look. It would be good to have a feature option to run the raster lines in the y-direction.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: