Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

This is a classic case of how 2D simulations of 3D things can be weird. @baperry2 and I have been discussing this and found an error in the gas phase source terms from the evaporating spray. Currently the source terms in 2D are per unit area, but mathematically they need to be per unit volume. The question then becomes what is that volume?

While we could set dz = dx and assume a narrow domain in the z-direction, this ignores the effect of Stefan flow in the z-direction, which dominates the flow field in quiescent flow cases. We're going to be looking into this more, but please let us know if you have ideas!

Replies: 2 comments 5 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
5 replies
@d-montgomery
Comment options

@Soobin120596
Comment options

@d-montgomery
Comment options

Answer selected by Soobin120596
@d-montgomery
Comment options

@Soobin120596
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants