You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This means that the sources are licensed under GPL-2+. However, the blurbs in the sources files (all, but the ones in src/io/gfx/scale2x/) contain the following statement:
* OpenJazz is distributed under the terms of
* the GNU General Public License, version 2.0
This, in turn, means that the sources are licensed under GPL-2, but not GPL-2+. Please decide for one variant or the other, but keep the license statements consistent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Apparently this situation dates back from when the licenses.txt file was added (d19391d).
When creating the README.md I also assumed GPL2+.
Alister is busy as always, even his website is currently offline. We can only wait for him to confirm.
Personally I think either way is fine. The third-party libraries we use are compatible.
The
licenses.txt
file states the following:This means that the sources are licensed under GPL-2+. However, the blurbs in the sources files (all, but the ones in
src/io/gfx/scale2x/
) contain the following statement:This, in turn, means that the sources are licensed under GPL-2, but not GPL-2+. Please decide for one variant or the other, but keep the license statements consistent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: