Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The AF value VarDict calculate cannot match with IGV result. #387

Open
GA-1101 opened this issue May 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

The AF value VarDict calculate cannot match with IGV result. #387

GA-1101 opened this issue May 9, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@GA-1101
Copy link

GA-1101 commented May 9, 2023

Hi,

I recently found that the AF in vcf file VarDict called cannot match with IGV browser.

IGV shows that in Chr9:5073770 the mutation G > T has AF 5% (0.05):
IGV

but VarDict show this position just has AF 0.005, because I set threshold of AF is 0.01 so it cannot PASS the FILTER. I use -p to show its information:
VD

My script is here:

vardict -G <hg19.fasta> -f 0.01 -N <sample_name> -b <bam_file> -c 1 -S 2 -E 3 -g 4 target_interval.bed | VarDictJava/VarDict/teststrandbias.R | VarDictJava/VarDict/var2vcf_valid.pl -N <sample_name> -E -f 0.01 > vars_VD.vcf
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant