Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend frenet_optimal_trajectory to support more scenarios #1073

Open
Aglargil opened this issue Sep 11, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #1114
Open

Extend frenet_optimal_trajectory to support more scenarios #1073

Aglargil opened this issue Sep 11, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #1114

Comments

@Aglargil
Copy link

Hi there,
First of all, thank you for the amazing PythonRobotics library! It's an incredibly valuable resource for learning robotics algorithms.
I've been working on the frenet_optimal_trajectory implementation lately, and noticed that it currently only handles Velocity Keeping for High Speed Trajectories.
I'm interested in extending it to support additional scenarios mentioned in the paper, such as:

  • Low Speed Trajectories
  • Following, Merging, and Stopping

Would you be open to accepting contributions to frenet_optimal_trajectory to handle these cases? I'd be happy to submit PR to implement them.

@AtsushiSakai
Copy link
Owner

@Aglargil Thank you. Yes, any kind of enhancement PRs are welcome.

@Aglargil Aglargil linked a pull request Dec 24, 2024 that will close this issue
3 tasks
@Aglargil
Copy link
Author

Aglargil commented Dec 24, 2024

@AtsushiSakai
Hello, I have submitted a PR addressing the content mentioned above: #1114

If there are any areas that need improvement, please feel free to let me know, and I will address them promptly.

Lastly, I am truly delighted to contribute in a small way to this amazing project. Wishing you a wonderful day!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants