Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BUG]Flaky test changeFeedQueryCompleteAfterEndLSN and readFeedDocumentsAfterSplit #44115

Open
3 tasks done
FabianMeiswinkel opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks done

[BUG]Flaky test changeFeedQueryCompleteAfterEndLSN and readFeedDocumentsAfterSplit #44115

FabianMeiswinkel opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
Cosmos test bug Problem in test source code (most likely)

Comments

@FabianMeiswinkel
Copy link
Member

Describe the bug
Disabled because flaky - please investigate and reenable
Information Checklist
Kindly make sure that you have added all the following information above and checkoff the required fields otherwise we will treat the issuer as an incomplete report

  • Bug Description Added
  • Repro Steps Added
  • Setup information Added
@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs-triage Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. label Feb 10, 2025
@FabianMeiswinkel FabianMeiswinkel changed the title [BUG]Flaky test changeFeedQueryCompleteAfterEndLSN [BUG]Flaky test changeFeedQueryCompleteAfterEndLSN and readFeedDocumentsAfterSplit Feb 10, 2025
@joshfree joshfree added Cosmos test bug Problem in test source code (most likely) labels Feb 11, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the needs-triage Workflow: This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. label Feb 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Cosmos test bug Problem in test source code (most likely)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@joshfree @FabianMeiswinkel