Skip to content

Conversation

@fadidurah
Copy link
Contributor

@fadidurah fadidurah commented Dec 6, 2025

Received an s360 item asking our libraries to always pull packages from feeds, and not declare mavenCentral as a repository to source dependencies. The feed itself has maven as an upstream. We cannot use AndroidADAL feed as that one has some versions deleted (once a version is deleted from a feed, it cannot be restored, even if an upstream has it). Created a new feed to support this https://identitydivision.visualstudio.com/Engineering/_artifacts/feed/NewAndroid. We pull packages from this new feed, but we still publish our versions to AndroidADAL. The new feed has AndroidADAL as an upstream still.

AB#3395409

@fadidurah fadidurah requested a review from a team as a code owner December 6, 2025 03:16
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2025

❌ Work item link check failed. Description does not contain AB#{ID}.

Click here to Learn more.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 8, 2025

✅ Work item link check complete. Description contains link AB#3395409 to an Azure Boards work item.

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Fadi/maven central Fadi/maven central, Fixes AB#3395409 Dec 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants