You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, plotting is left to the developer of the Material Problems, whereas, for Sensors, the user can decide which fields they want to save. Most of paraview plots have a very similar structure (either direct storage of some component of problem.fields or projection of sth, in problem.q_fields), therefore i would suggest to introduce sth. like
I am not sure how you would use this.
I would rather suggest to directly combine sensors and paraview output.
A "DisplacementPlot" is nothing then a "full field displacement sensor".
Basically only write to paraview, what has been captured by a sensor.
This would also make adopting VMAP later on simple, as this is the idea there. Longterm, we want to use VMAP as the output format and then generate paraview outputs based on that.
Do you mean that a sensor should get a method to write the full field to paraview and the normal sensor output is still included? Or do you mean that also the PointSensor output should be somehow written to paraview and the full plot is just a special case of that?
Currently, plotting is left to the developer of the Material Problems, whereas, for Sensors, the user can decide which fields they want to save. Most of paraview plots have a very similar structure (either direct storage of some component of
problem.fields
or projection of sth, inproblem.q_fields
), therefore i would suggest to introduce sth. likeThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: