Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: 增强回复引文高亮和来源查看(类似于 NotebookLM) #1958

Open
4 tasks done
ruanjunmin opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
4 tasks done
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ruanjunmin
Copy link

Issue Checklist

  • I understand that issues are for reporting problems and requesting features, not for off-topic comments, and I will provide as much detail as possible to help resolve the issue.
  • I have checked the pinned issues and searched through the existing open issues and closed issues and did not find a similar suggestion.
  • I have provided a short and descriptive title so that developers can quickly understand the issue when browsing the issue list, rather than vague titles like "A suggestion" or "Stuck."
  • The latest version of Cherry Studio does not include the feature I am suggesting.

Platform

Windows

Version

v 1.0.0

Is your feature request related to an existing issue?

好像没有看到类似的同类需求建议

Desired Solution

我建议使用以下功能增强引文系统,模仿在 NotebookLM 中观察到的功能:

颜色编码高亮: 生成回复时,直接来自源材料的文本部分应使用不同的颜色突出显示。每个来源都应该有独特的颜色,从而可以立即清楚哪个来源对回复的哪个部分做出了贡献。如附图所示(如有必要,请替换为您提供的图像,并托管在图床服务上,例如路过图床)。

互动引文:

单击回复中突出显示的部分或引文标记(例如,上标数字或类似标记)应自动将来源面板滚动到原始文档中的相应位置。
将鼠标悬停在突出显示的部分或引文标记上应显示一个工具提示或弹出窗口,显示来自来源的完整相关文本摘录,无需滚动即可快速验证。
来源面板集成: 来源面板应清楚地表明当前正在使用哪些来源来生成回复(例如,使用复选框,如示例图像所示)。还应该可以轻松包含或排除特定来源。

优点:

提高透明度: 用户可以轻松查看生成的回复与源材料之间的直接关系。
提高可验证性: 可以根据原始来源快速轻松地检查回复的准确性。
增强用户体验: 交互式高亮显示和来源导航使理解信息的上下文和来源变得更加容易。
更好的信任度和可靠性:有助于建立对平台的信心。
示例图片:
(在此处插入提供的图像链接。请将它们上传到图床上。)

第一张图片显示了 NotebookLM 的整体视图。突出显示的部分代表了关键思想。

Image

第二张图片显示了信息来源面板。此面板管理用户正在使用的信息。

Image

还有其他功能NotebookLM 都处理得很好,也可以借鉴。

Alternative Solutions

No response

Additional Information

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant