Skip to content

[Fix #4673] Migrate EvalAI CI/CD Workflow to Github Actions #4685

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Zahed-Riyaz
Copy link
Contributor

@Zahed-Riyaz Zahed-Riyaz commented Jun 19, 2025

As a fix for Issue #4673 , his PR aims to :

  • Completely migrate EvalAI's current CI/CD workflow from Travis CI to Github Actions.
  • Setup CI checks for linting, migrations, and static type checks.
  • Decommission .travis.yml and remove Travis-specific config/integration from the repository.
  • Update documentation to reflect the CI migration : make changes in README.md and other files to reflect the changes made.

The github actions default variables to replace the travis CI variables are provided this link : https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/store-information-in-variables#default-environment-variables

@Zahed-Riyaz Zahed-Riyaz changed the title Migrate EvalAI CI/CD Workflow to Github Actions [Fix #4673] Migrate EvalAI CI/CD Workflow to Github Actions Jun 19, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.67%. Comparing base (96968d6) to head (d677b49).
Report is 1188 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4685      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.93%   69.67%   -3.26%     
==========================================
  Files          83       21      -62     
  Lines        5368     3608    -1760     
==========================================
- Hits         3915     2514    -1401     
+ Misses       1453     1094     -359     

see 73 files with indirect coverage changes

see 73 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ce48ed6...d677b49. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Zahed-Riyaz Zahed-Riyaz marked this pull request as ready for review June 22, 2025 11:54
@Zahed-Riyaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zahed-Riyaz commented Jun 22, 2025

Hi @RishabhJain2018 this PR is ready for review.
I've updated all the travis variables to github actions variables
-TRAVIS_BRANCH <->GITHUB_REF_NAME
-TRAVIS_PULL_REQUEST <-> checks to see if GITHUB_EVENT_NAME == "pull request" & so on.
-All the Travis CI checks are passed by Github actions.
-Package and Deploy is for main/master branch only, so it skips.

The docs have also been been updated to reflect Github Actions now instead of Travis CI. Let me know if any changes are to be made.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants