Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add BTC/GUSD and ETH/GUSD trading pairs for Gemini #4

Open
bryanroth opened this issue Feb 26, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Add BTC/GUSD and ETH/GUSD trading pairs for Gemini #4

bryanroth opened this issue Feb 26, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@bryanroth
Copy link

User Story

As a user I want to be able to use the BTC/GUSD and ETH/GUSD trading pairs with Gemini schedules so I don’t have to convert GUSD to USD in order for a schedule to work.

Description

Both BTC/GUSD and ETH/GUSD are valid trading pairs in Gemini but don’t appear in the list of trading pairs when creating a schedule for Gemini.

@ShamanShaz ShamanShaz added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 27, 2022
@ShamanShaz
Copy link
Collaborator

That's an interesting bug. For some reason Gemini's API does not offer GUSD as a trading pair for any crypto.

I double checked to see if this was an error with new listings like Solano, Ray, etc but it seems not. Users are able to place orders for the new tokens via the API.

This might be an issue with the underlying ccxt library, I'll check in with them.

@bryanroth
Copy link
Author

Yeah, I checked the ccxt library and it seems like these trading pairs are just not supported.

However, it looks like it's possible to convert GUSD to USD via the Gemini API. Check out the following link and scroll down to the "Convert GUSD to USD (For Automating Deposits)" section. This code does leverage the gemini-python library but you might be able to reuse the logic here to do the same thing in DCAStack.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants