You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Prompted by this user question regarding failure of mrds 2.2.8 to fit a hazard rate to binned data with error
Error in integrate: the integral is probably divergent. All models failed to fit.
while mrds 2.1.18 (circa 2018) was able to fit the hazard rate data to the same model. The natural question is "What does DistWin do?"
The answer is that DistWin is successfully able to fit said model to said data without the error message. Note, the binning with DistWin was done with cutpoints 0, 99, 199, 299, 399 to align with how ds bins when argument cutpoints=c(0,100,200,300,400).
Hence mrds 2.2.8 falls farther from DistWin hazard rate optimisation (for this data set) than did mrds 2.1.18
Data provided by user and available (along with DistWin project) upon request
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@LHMarshall can you please contact the original user and let the know about the new mcds.exe optimizer, and see if that fixes the issue for now (while we do further work on the optimizer).
Prompted by this user question regarding failure of
mrds
2.2.8 to fit a hazard rate to binned data with errorwhile
mrds
2.1.18 (circa 2018) was able to fit the hazard rate data to the same model. The natural question is "What does DistWin do?"The answer is that DistWin is successfully able to fit said model to said data without the error message. Note, the binning with DistWin was done with cutpoints 0, 99, 199, 299, 399 to align with how
ds
bins when argumentcutpoints=c(0,100,200,300,400)
.Hence
mrds 2.2.8
falls farther from DistWin hazard rate optimisation (for this data set) than didmrds 2.1.18
Data provided by user and available (along with DistWin project) upon request
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: