Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add rpg2000-rtp and rpg2003-rtp packages #7

Open
pirate486743186 opened this issue Nov 1, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

add rpg2000-rtp and rpg2003-rtp packages #7

pirate486743186 opened this issue Nov 1, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@pirate486743186
Copy link

You already know about rpg2000-rtp and rpg2003-rtp from AUR.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rpg2000-rtp/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rpg2003-rtp/

It would be nice if this was included on OBS for all supported bistros.

@Ghabry
Copy link
Member

Ghabry commented Nov 1, 2019

I'm not sure if obs allows nonfree packages

@pirate486743186
Copy link
Author

pirate486743186 commented Nov 1, 2019

They are like the flash package. It asks you to accept their term of use, then downloads it from their site and unpacks it. It doesn't contain the actual data.

You could call them "-installer". Calling it non-free is a bit of a stretch IMHO.

EDIT: I think that i was reading the package build script... the built package actually contains the data. Yea well then, i mean make installers like the flash installer. Not a package with the data in it.

@pirate486743186
Copy link
Author

I'm thinking of something like this.

The package would install a bash script in /usr/lib/XXX . The post install script, would run that script. The script would ask the user to accept the terms of use, then it would download, unpack and install the RTP in /usr/share/XXX . If installation was run with "-y", then asking to accept the TOS is skipped. The pre removal script of the package would delete the RTP. This package will only be a suggested dependency.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants