To fix

[PonteIneptique]

From @hcayless

Looking at https://github.com/lascivaroma/cil004-00000/blob/master/data/cil004-00000/00002/cil004-00000.00002.manfred-lat1.xml

<expan><abbr>d</abbr><ex>uum</ex><abbr>v</abbr></expan><expan><ex>irum</ex></expan>

1. <lb/> is a line beginning, so the first one should be at the start of the first line.
2. I wouldn't wrap <gap/>s in <w>, because we don't know what was in them. To be honest, I probably wouldn't use <w> at all, or only in cases where it might be ambiguous whether something was a word or not.

<expan><abbr>d</abbr><ex>uum</ex><abbr>v</abbr></expan><expan><ex>irum</ex></expan>

should be

<expan><abbr>d</abbr><ex>uum</ex><abbr>v</abbr><ex>irum</ex></expan>

4. In https://github.com/lascivaroma/cil004-00000/blob/master/data/cil004-00000/00002/cil004-00000.00002.manfred-lat1.xml,

ae<supplied reason="lost"><expan><abbr>d</abbr><ex>ilem</ex></expan></supplied>

should be

<expan><abbr>ae<supplied reason="lost">d</supplied></abbr><ex>ilem</ex></expan>

5. In https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lascivaroma/cil004-00000/master/data/cil004-00000/00082/cil004-00000.00082.manfred-lat1.xml,

o<supplied reason="lost">ro</supplied></w> <w n="6"><supplied
reason="lost"><expan><abbr>v</abbr><ex>os</ex></expan></supplied></w>
<w n="7"><expan><abbr>[f</abbr><ex
cert="low">aciatis</ex><abbr>]</abbr></expan>

should be

o<supplied reason="lost">ro
<expan><abbr>v</abbr><ex>os</ex></expan><expan><abbr>f</abbr><ex
cert="low">aciatis</ex></expan></supplied>

The latter highlights a reason maybe not to do <w>, because things like <supplied> can run across words. If you really want to mark words, you'll need to bridge the gaps in the sliced up with @prev/@next.

[PonteIneptique]

For the 5th point, I might be forced to do

 <expan><abbr><supplied reason="lost">f</supplied></abbr><ex cert="low">aciatis</ex></expan>

The question I'd ask is : could you give me an example of prev/next use ? @hcayless