Question: Understanding if license resultion is working as intended

[a-recknagel]

• I have checked for similar questions in the project's issue tracker to avoid duplicates.
• I have searched existing issues to see if this question has been asked before.

Your Question

My issue can be replicated with the following setup:
requirements.txt

certifi

command

licensecheck -l "PROPRIETARY" --only-licenses MPL -u "requirements:requirements.txt"

output

                  Info                   
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ Item            ┃ Value               ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ program         │ licensecheck        │
│ version         │ 2024.3              │
│ license         │ MIT LICENSE         │
│ project_license │ PROPRIETARY LICENSE │
└─────────────────┴─────────────────────┘
                                                               
                       List Of Packages                        
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ Compatible ┃ Package ┃ License(s)                           ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ ✖          │ certifi │ MOZILLA PUBLIC LICENSE 2.0 (MPL 2.0)│
└────────────┴─────────┴──────────────────────────────────────┘

I would have thought that setting MPL on the allowlist would make MPL projects compatible, but it seems the project license is also taken into account (if I set -l MPL I get a check-mark). Is that how it's supposed to work?

[a-recknagel]

My bad, looks like this is a duplicate of #86. Feel free to close.