Is an IPv6 link local next-hop currently supported for BGP? #19228
Unanswered
bgshacklett
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
https://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/bgp.html#clicmd-neighbor-PEER-interface-IFNAME So configure the LL address as the neighbor and then issue the above command. Additionally you can do it this way: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Seems like I was a little premature in marking this as the answer. It solves part of the puzzle, but it appears that there's at least some additional required functionality targeting v10.5: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I'm trying to get BGP up and running between two routers. I've got an adjacency up and running using link local addresses, and routes are being advertised, but they're not being installed in the routing table on either router. The problem appears to be related to link local addressing and lack of an interface identifier, but BGP is not my strong suit, especially with IPv6.
Examples from
show bgp ipv6 detail
andshow bgp nexthop
:Router A:
Router B:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions