-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Licence(s) #295
Comments
There is a specific License section in this repo's ReadMe:
Isn't this sufficient? I understand it may not be easy to find out an author through commits. I've just today noticed that a file I myself uploaded 8 years ago was reuploaded last year by another author, with inexplicable (and needless) changes to it. Enforcing this would be extremely difficult. It would be easier if contributors populated the Project info fields directly within FreeCAD (File --> Project information menu). I admit to not having done it myself. An easy way out would be to use a more permissive CC license without attribution, maybe? If anyone is unwilling to comply to this license, then they could just avoid uploading files. |
i think an CC0 would be a one option - |
Should the license be updated to CC-BY-4.0? In the main README.md file is stated that all parts are under the CC-BY-3.0 licenses. In FreeCAD 0.19, Link branch and 0.20 versions in the Is it viable to just change the README.md file or not? Another option is to add |
Sorry that i didn't reply to this Issue sooner. I must have missed the section in the Readme, sorry. |
This video explains some licenses simply but thoroughly:
|
Hi,
i'm a beginner and starting to do some open (source) hardware projects with freecad.
Libraries like this make designing much faster and less tedious, but i want to give good credit to every person whose tools or parts i used to aid me.
So i'm concerned about the Licence of this Workbench. I could not find Licence information in this repo or the wiki neither about the code nor about the library of parts.
I think its important that this Workbench gets propper licences and some explanaition for the users of this workbench, so nobody accidentaly does not credit the work of others and nobody gets into legal trouble.
The People maintaining the BOLTS library made a nice writeup detailing the problems for the maintainers and the users which might aid this library too: https://www.bolts-library.org/en/docs/0.3/document/general/licensing.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: