Wondering if they adhere to the license...

[PlasmaHH]

Anyone ever heard of them? https://www.contatoregeiger.net/de/contatori-geiger/contatore-geiger-fnirsi-gc01-m1-migliorato/ they take quite a bit extra for their improved version ^^

[jonwhite227]

Yes, more than 5 x the price for cutting a (neat) hole in the back and installing RadPro... I very much doubt they pay Fnirsi any royalties, but I doubt any of the other copcats do either. 😂

[domjan1984]

Anyone ever heard of them? https://www.contatoregeiger.net/de/contatori-geiger/contatore-geiger-fnirsi-gc01-m1-migliorato/ they take quite a bit extra for their improved version ^^

Be careful with that site – you're getting a factory GC-01 for €290, but who knows what firmware it's running.
If you want something decent, get a genuine Fnirsi from a reliable source – it comes with a J321 sensor by default.
If you're after something even better (similar sensitivity, 1-week logging time), go for the Bosean FS5000.

P.S. – This site doesn't even seem to know what it's selling. In one picture the M1 has the small sensor tube, in another it's shown with the large one... Suspicious.

[PlasmaHH]

judging by the screenshots it is running radpro, which is why I was wondering here if they adhere to the radpro license

[NuclearPhoenixx]

Radpro uses the MIT license which can be translated to "do whatever you want, but leave me out of it".

[PlasmaHH]

It also contains

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

[NuclearPhoenixx]

Sure, but without actually buying the product this is impossible to answer. They might ship a short manual or info card with the product where they printed a short copyright notice or maybe even on the packaging. Or maybe the notice is hidden somewhere on their website.

Nevertheless, the page looks insanely sketchy, not even looking at that price. I hope that nobody actually supports this lazy cashgrab.