Failure to build

[wolfram77]

Hi, I am a PhD student working on parallel graph algorithms. I was looking into building this C++ based implementation of GraphBLAS, but it seems to fail on our server. Our server is installed with CentOS Stream 8, and has GCC 13.2 installed. Below are the error messages:

In file included from /home/subhajit.sahu/Documents/BLASPP/GraphBLAS--rgri/include/./grb/containers/matrix.hpp:4,
                 from /home/subhajit.sahu/Documents/BLASPP/GraphBLAS--rgri/include/./grb/util/generate.hpp:2,
                 from /home/subhajit.sahu/Documents/BLASPP/GraphBLAS--rgri/include/./grb/util/util.hpp:4,
                 from /home/subhajit.sahu/Documents/BLASPP/GraphBLAS--rgri/include/./grb/grb.hpp:4,
                 from /home/subhajit.sahu/Documents/BLASPP/GraphBLAS--rgri/examples/assign_example.cpp:1:
/home/subhajit.sahu/Documents/BLASPP/GraphBLAS--rgri/include/./grb/containers/backend/coo_matrix.hpp:24:29: error: ‘vector’ in namespace ‘std’ does not name a template type
   24 |   using backend_type = std::vector<value_type, backend_allocator_type>;
      |                             ^~~~~~
/home/subhajit.sahu/Documents/BLASPP/GraphBLAS--rgri/include/./grb/containers/backend/coo_matrix.hpp:5:1: note: ‘std::vector’ is defined in header ‘<vector>’; did you forget to ‘#include <vector>’?
    4 | #include <grb/containers/matrix_entry.hpp>
  +++ |+#include <vector>
    5 |

... (many more)

This issue is not critical. I only post this, just in case, you have an easy fix for this.

[BenBrock]

Thanks for posting this. I believe the proximal issue with vector not being included should be fixed now. Can you let me know if you're still having issues and also point me to exactly what you're compiling? Are you using the CMake build system?

[wolfram77]

@BenBrock I haven't changed any other build commands, and the build work fine now. I have been doing a performance comparison of PetGraph (Rust), Stanford Network Analysis Platform (SNAP), SuiteSparse:GraphBLAS, cuGraph, Aspen, and our own graph implementation - also wanted to do performance comparison of rgri, but it is not included. It may still be of interest to you.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.13862