Skip to content

Box warp doesn't treat subpaths as unified object #3551

@astrosticks

Description

@astrosticks

It would make sense that a box warp on a group of paths would treat the group as a single object and keep all subpaths sized and positioned relative to each other. In practice, this operation works on each subpath as separate objects, which isn't very useful.

Image

I'm not sure conceptually where you should be able to distinguish between the two operations, but performing it on a layer containing multiple subpaths seems like the trivial scenario when the earlier behavior would be desired. Maybe it's as simple as a boolean input e.g. "Combined" on the box warp node.

Image

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    Projects

    Status

    Short-Term

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions