We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently all the URIs like http://def.isotc211.org/iso19150/-2/2012/base#constraint result in a 404.
@BrodeurJS Will this change and is there a plan when this will happen?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This was discussed in a GOM meeting. It is unclear, when, if ever, the URIs will de-reference.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Out of curiosity, are there any plans to fix this? http://def.isotc211.org/iso19150/-2/2012/base#constraint does not resolve, but http://def.isotc211.org/iso19150/-2/2012/base.rdf#constraint does. The latter is a different URI of course, but this does suggest that all the files are there, and it's just a matter of adding some content-type negotiation somewhere. I'm not an expert on Amazon Cloudfront, but I'd be surprised if they didn't support this.
No branches or pull requests
Currently all the URIs like http://def.isotc211.org/iso19150/-2/2012/base#constraint result in a 404.
@BrodeurJS Will this change and is there a plan when this will happen?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: