Contributor Journey Optimization

[dellagustin-sap]

Description

Contributor Journey Optimization (CJO) is a method, currently under ideation and development, that describes how a project can be evaluated for the creation of concrete tasks for the adoption of InnerSource, specifically aiming to facilitate the journey of project stakeholders in becoming contributors, trusted committers and/or maintainers.

Results

• Miro Board - Contributor Journey Optimization (Idea Board)
• Planned: Creation of a new pattern

Related Meetings

• ISPO Working Group Meeting - 2024 - 12 - 16

[spier]

@dellagustin-sap the idea looks interesting. I understand it as reducing the barrier to entry i.e. making contributions as easy as possible.

I have access to the miro board linked above, and left some comments there.

Have you already checked if there open source community has already created documentation related to this problem space?

Further I am wondering if in InnerSource additional methods can be used that would be harder to implement in open source.

[rrrutledge]

@dellagustin-sap let us know how this is going (or if it is still something being worked on?

[dellagustin-sap]

@rrrutledge , I have not done much since I presented it in Dec 16, but I'm still working on it.
I will present it on the InnerSource Gathering in Berlin.

[spier]

@dellagustin-sap that Gathering is March 12th I believe.

I would love to help with this.

My experience is that people will contribute more easily to an existing pattern, rather than starting from zero.

Therefore my aim here would be to have a version of this pattern merged to the repo ahead of the Gathering.

Then we can give people something that they can disagree with, if you know what I mean :)

[dellagustin-sap]

@spier , that's also my goal, I want to have a v1 of my idea board completed and at least a merged initial pattern before the gathering.

[spier]

@dellagustin-sap I did little experiment with ChatGPT about this:
https://gist.github.com/spier/724794bb1e18060c5b9fdce77a18a5dd

I do like the stage names that it made up. unaware/aware and supporter sound useful.

Also note the amazing examples of hallucination related to the existing patterns.
ChatGPT really invented pattern names (and even URLs) that should existing but don't :)

[rrrutledge]

That’s crazy - is ChatGPT just glorified pattern matching?

[spier]

That’s crazy - is ChatGPT just glorified pattern matching?

Hehe, I would argue it does a little bit more interesting stuff than this :) In this example I found ChatGPT to be a great brainstorming-buddy.