Skip to content

Implement extent checks for point-polygon processes #229

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 26, 2025

Conversation

asinghvi17
Copy link
Member

This should ideally test whether that introduces any bugs.

This should ideally test whether that introduces any bugs.
@rafaqz
Copy link
Member

rafaqz commented Oct 26, 2024

Nice. Got any before/after benchmarks?

@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member Author

Not beyond "keeps running" vs "computation finishes" :D

@rafaqz
Copy link
Member

rafaqz commented Oct 26, 2024

Finishing is good

@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member Author

@rafaqz would you mind giving this a sense check to see if it makes sense? I'm not 100% firm on how the maybe_skip interface works.

@rafaqz
Copy link
Member

rafaqz commented Nov 11, 2024

@skygering maybe better if you review this if you can, I also don't really know the interface

@asinghvi17 asinghvi17 requested a review from skygering November 19, 2024 15:56
@rafaqz
Copy link
Member

rafaqz commented Mar 8, 2025

Is this added elsewhere now?

@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member Author

No, this would just have to be merged as is

@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member Author

I think I was waiting for Skylar to look at this though, maybe we should just merge and have a test case?

@rafaqz
Copy link
Member

rafaqz commented Mar 9, 2025

I think it's fine

@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member Author

I might merge this too for this release

@asinghvi17 asinghvi17 merged commit e7e5240 into main Apr 26, 2025
10 checks passed
@asinghvi17 asinghvi17 deleted the as/extent_checks branch May 15, 2025 01:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants