Skip to content

Naming convention cleanup #105

@HadrienG2

Description

@HadrienG2

I greatly appreciate the work you did to make naming clearer and more consistent than the Intel intrinsics. That being said, there's still a bit of work to do to perfect this, particularly around shuffles and permute. However, that would be an API-breaking change by definition.

How would you feel about a patch for this ? Break API and bump semver release number, or keep the existing methods as deprecated with new aliases following the convention ?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions