Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Behavior References in MAEC Report #11

Open
leotant opened this issue Jan 25, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Behavior References in MAEC Report #11

leotant opened this issue Jan 25, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@leotant
Copy link

leotant commented Jan 25, 2018

Hello, I have implemented the MAEC reporting module in cuckoo 2.0 and I am able to generate the corresponding reports. However, I noticed that there aren't any behavior references linked to the capabilities included in the report (to see which particular action executed by the malware triggered a specific capability).

I had previously looked into the MAEC examples for cuckoo and stumbled upon this schema:
https://github.com/MAECProject/schemas/blob/master/examples/package_capability.json

This file contains the following snippet:

"capabilities": [
{
"name": "persistence",
"refined_capabilities": [
{
"name": "continuous-execution",
"behavior_refs": ["behavior--2099d4c1-0e8a-49d2-8d32-f0427e1ff817"]
}
]
}
],

Is there any way to generate reports that also include the aforementioned "behavior_refs" using Cuckoo and MAEC?

Thanks

@leotant leotant changed the title Behavior References in Behavior References in MAEC Report Jan 26, 2018
@dzbeck
Copy link

dzbeck commented Feb 1, 2018

Hi - Behaviors have not yet been captured in the MAEC reporting module for Cuckoo. The current (beta) release of the module is limited to the following data:

  • Malware Instance
    * Labels
    * Capabilities
    * Analysis Metadata
    * Dynamic Features
    - Actions
    - Process Tree
    * Static Features
    - Strings
    * Triggered Signatures
  • AV Classifications

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants