You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One additional thing to flag: it appears that candidatevotes across candidates do not sum to the totalvotes in a few FIPS codes in VA: 51760, 51770, 51515, 51019, 51059, 51067, 51600, 51620, 51159, 51161. Should this be the case? Looks like the totalvotes field is the total votes for the county name, but there are a few distinct FIPS codes in VA with the same county name listed here. (i.e. "Richmond" and "Richmond City" FIPS both listed as "Richmond".) I don't believe this was an issue in previous versions of the dataset!
Perhaps this is intentional, but wanted to flag as it may be slightly confusing!
Thanks again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi again :)
One additional thing to flag: it appears that
candidatevotesacross candidates do not sum to thetotalvotesin a few FIPS codes in VA: 51760, 51770, 51515, 51019, 51059, 51067, 51600, 51620, 51159, 51161. Should this be the case? Looks like thetotalvotesfield is the total votes for the county name, but there are a few distinct FIPS codes in VA with the same county name listed here. (i.e. "Richmond" and "Richmond City" FIPS both listed as "Richmond".) I don't believe this was an issue in previous versions of the dataset!Perhaps this is intentional, but wanted to flag as it may be slightly confusing!
Thanks again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: