We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
in
∈
Originally from here:
I think ∈ should be a synonym for in so you can write for x ∈ L do ..., though maybe we can also add new syntactic sugar x in L which calls isMember!
for x ∈ L do ...
x in L
isMember
To clarify, there would be two situations for in:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
another pair of symbols which are already synonyms, but for which the current syntax doesn't match proper mathematical conventions, is
"∀" => "all", "∃" => "any",
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Originally from here:
To clarify, there would be two situations for
in
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: