Replies: 1 comment
-
Yes, this sentence can be stated in a more rigorous way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello, first thank you for this work!
Sorry if I misunderstood something, but in proof box 2.1 of page 39, it is stated that:
This would be true if$P_{\pi}^k$ were an elementwise exponent, but it appears to be a matrix exponent. For instance:
(Which is of course not a proper stochastic matrix), satisfies the "every entry is nonnegative and no greater than one" condition, but:
Clearly does not satisfy$0 \leq P_{\pi}^k \leq 1$ .
Shouldn't the argument be based on$P_{\pi}$ being a stochastic matrix with a spectral radius of one instead ?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions