Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove reliance on watchman #62

Open
batjko opened this issue Sep 20, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Remove reliance on watchman #62

batjko opened this issue Sep 20, 2017 · 5 comments
Milestone

Comments

@batjko
Copy link

batjko commented Sep 20, 2017

In the interest of reducing annoyance of non-Mac users (especially windows ones), avoiding watchman would be a great boon for this package.

I am not sure what it should be replaced with, but ideally with something built into this package.

Many thanks!

@Mayank1791989
Copy link
Owner

This was already added in v3 (will be released soon).

@FezVrasta
Copy link

any updates on this?

@batjko
Copy link
Author

batjko commented Dec 31, 2017

This was already added in v3 (will be released soon).

What's the schedule for v3?

@danielkcz
Copy link

danielkcz commented Feb 22, 2018

Just want to note here, that with Watchman Beta for Windows it's working just fine. I haven't run into any issues. Personally, I am against removing watchman. It's great tool conserving system resources into a single point instead of having numerous watchers over the same files. At least make it configurable so it's still possible to use Watchman.

@Mayank1791989
Copy link
Owner

@FredyC in v3 watchman is not removed. It will use NodeWatcher only if watchman is not present.

Mayank1791989 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2018
BREAKING_CHANGE: structure of .gqlconfig file changed.

closes #3, closes #23, closes #28, closes #45, closes #52, closes #62, closes #99, closes #100, closes #115
Mayank1791989 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 30, 2018
BREAKING_CHANGE: structure of .gqlconfig file changed.

closes #3, closes #23, closes #28, closes #45, closes #52, closes #62, closes #99, closes #100, closes #115
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants