You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was trying to understand how suite2p determines which ROIs are considered as also being present in the second channel so I started going into the source code. I noticed that there is a function which corrects for bleed through from the green channel which is great. However, I also noticed that when the intensity_ratio is used to actually detect red cells, the meanImg_chan2 is used instead of meanImg_chan2_corrected to get the intensity values. So I was just wondering if perhaps the corrected image should be used instead? Otherwise, unless I missed it, I don't see the meanImg_chan2_corrected being used anywhere else except for visualisation purposes.
Reproduce the code example:
defintensity_ratio(ops, stats):
""" compute pixels in cell and in area around cell (including overlaps) (exclude pixels from other cells) """
.
.
.
# here in line 70 perhaps it should be:mimg2=ops["meanImg_chan2_corrected"]
#instead of:mimg2=ops["meanImg_chan2"]
inpix=cell_masks @ mimg2.flatten()
extpix=neuropil_masks @ mimg2.flatten()
inpix=np.maximum(1e-3, inpix)
redprob=inpix/ (inpix+extpix)
redcell=redprob>ops["chan2_thres"]
returnnp.stack((redcell, redprob), axis=-1)
Error message:
No response
Version information:
v0.10.4.dev9+gf93c1ca.d20220615
Context for the issue:
This could hopefully make the red cell detection more accurate. Many thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the issue:
I was trying to understand how suite2p determines which ROIs are considered as also being present in the second channel so I started going into the source code. I noticed that there is a function which corrects for bleed through from the green channel which is great. However, I also noticed that when the intensity_ratio is used to actually detect red cells, the meanImg_chan2 is used instead of meanImg_chan2_corrected to get the intensity values. So I was just wondering if perhaps the corrected image should be used instead? Otherwise, unless I missed it, I don't see the meanImg_chan2_corrected being used anywhere else except for visualisation purposes.
Reproduce the code example:
Error message:
No response
Version information:
v0.10.4.dev9+gf93c1ca.d20220615
Context for the issue:
This could hopefully make the red cell detection more accurate. Many thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: