We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I think parameter CS%use_Stanley_ML is being recorded incorrectly when USE_BODNER23 is true; see here.
CS%use_Stanley_M
USE_BODNER23
First, use_Stanley_ML is not implemented in subroutine mixedlayer_restrat_Bodner, so making it available with this option does not make sense.
use_Stanley_ML
mixedlayer_restrat_Bodner
Second, were use_Stanley_ML a valid option for mixedlayer_restrat_Bodner, the get_param should use USE_STANLEY_ML instead of USE_STANLEY_TVAR.
get_param
USE_STANLEY_ML
USE_STANLEY_TVAR
I suggest we remove this. call to avoid confusion.
This can be added to #327
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Agreed. I will put it on my list to add the Stanley density correction to the Bodner ML code.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I think parameter
CS%use_Stanley_M
L is being recorded incorrectly whenUSE_BODNER23
is true; see here.First,
use_Stanley_ML
is not implemented in subroutinemixedlayer_restrat_Bodner
, so making it available with this option does not make sense.Second, were
use_Stanley_ML
a valid option formixedlayer_restrat_Bodner
, theget_param
should useUSE_STANLEY_ML
instead ofUSE_STANLEY_TVAR
.I suggest we remove this. call to avoid confusion.
This can be added to #327
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: