You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello
I am running WRF-HYDRO for a specific basin.
I have prepared all the data needed for running and now I am testing the channel routing options. I have tried the Muskingum-Cunge and now the diffusive wave option. When running the latter I see that the discharges are very small compared to the ones obtained with the M-C scheme. Is there a reason why there should be such a sharp difference ? has anybody experienced such kind of behavior ?
best
jac
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello
I am running WRF-HYDRO for a specific basin.
I have prepared all the data needed for running and now I am testing the channel routing options. I have tried the Muskingum-Cunge and now the diffusive wave option. When running the latter I see that the discharges are very small compared to the ones obtained with the M-C scheme. Is there a reason why there should be such a sharp difference ? has anybody experienced such kind of behavior ?
best
jac
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions