Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

metadata.alternateIdentifier.resolvable #435

Open
gothub opened this issue Jan 7, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

metadata.alternateIdentifier.resolvable #435

gothub opened this issue Jan 7, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@gothub
Copy link
Contributor

gothub commented Jan 7, 2022

Description

Verify that an alternate identifier associated with the metadata is resolvable.

This check is similar to metadata.identifier.resolvable but for an alternate identifier, not the primary one.

Priority

  • FAIR: Optional
  • ESSDIVE: Required

Issues

  • The EML schema clearly specifies the alternate identifier, but it's not clear (to me) what this is for ISO, schema.org, DataCite, so these have to be determined before this check can be included in the FAIR suite.
  • ESS-DIVE may use this check, possibly in a suite version after 1.1.0. They may have other criteria for the validity of the content that the alternate identifier resolves to, which has yet to be determined, and may warrant an additional check.
  • related issues:

Procedure

check if a metadata alternate identifier is present and resolves, and if not then the check fails

@gothub gothub self-assigned this Jan 7, 2022
@gothub
Copy link
Contributor Author

gothub commented Jan 19, 2022

@JEDamerow @emilyarobles - you had mentioned that for ESS-DIVE, you manually check '/eml/dataset/alternativeIdentifier' to see if it is resolvable, and then manually check if the web page that is linked to correctly describes the metadata document that is referencing it.

Can any part of this check be automated? This could be split into multiple checks:

  • this check (metadata.alternateIdentifier.resolvable) verifies the alternateIdentifier is resolvable (this could be used by other repos as well)
  • another check something about the web page being referred to. I don't know what this would be or what the check would be called.

@JEDamerow
Copy link
Contributor

@gothub We decided that due to variation in how people use this field, and other issues. that we will not include this in the updated suite of checks at this time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants