POD discussion: CPT metrics #130
Unanswered
tsjackson-noaa
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The following notes provide further background on issues Zun Yin encountered. These are from my own notes, so apologies if I've misunderstood the issues raised.
In addition, we strongly recommend using xarray to handle input data, since it has some support for CF conventions which simplifies dealing with some of the issues mentioned. It's reasonable to design a POD assuming its input data will be CF-compliant.
Issues that are addressable in the current code:
There are ways to accomplish some of the issues you brought up in the current release of the code (officially v3 beta 2, but you should use the main branch instead). As an example, I'd suggest looking at the settings file for the convective transition diagnostics POD, with the caveat that the format of this file will be changed in the upcoming release (see below).
Addressed in upcoming release (v3 beta 3):
We're working on a new release that addresses some of the other issues. It involves a more detailed setting file format, described in the documentation, which all new diagnostics should use. As an example, compare the settings file for the convective transition diagnostics in the new format.
Possible feature requests:
The following issues aren't addressed by currently written code. If they're major obstacles to writing your POD, you should advocate for them by opening a feature request (as a github issue).
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions