You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a question about the R_{compete} term. The paper states as follows about R_{compete}:
"During optimization, this new term leads to new images the student cannot easily classify whereas the teacher can."
Since the Jensen-Shanon divergence is symmetry in terms of p(x^{hat}) and q(x^{hat}), the opposite might be true: The images are generated such that the teacher cannot classify them, but the student can.
Is it correct? And does it contradicts the purpose of the R_{compete} term?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for your interesting research,
I have a question about the R_{compete} term. The paper states as follows about R_{compete}:
"During optimization, this new term leads to new images the student cannot easily classify whereas the teacher can."
Since the Jensen-Shanon divergence is symmetry in terms of p(x^{hat}) and q(x^{hat}), the opposite might be true: The images are generated such that the teacher cannot classify them, but the student can.
Is it correct? And does it contradicts the purpose of the R_{compete} term?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: