You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
title = {Semantic {{Integration}} of {{Heterogeneous Databases}} of {{Same Domain Using Ontology}}},
314
+
author = {{Asfand-E-Yar}, Muhammad and Ali, Ramis},
315
+
year = {2020},
316
+
journal = {IEEE Access},
317
+
volume = {8},
318
+
pages = {77903--77919},
319
+
issn = {2169-3536},
320
+
doi = {10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988685},
321
+
urldate = {2024-05-13},
322
+
abstract = {Heterogeneous database integration is the study of integrating data from multiple databases. Integrating the heterogeneous database of the same domain has three main challenges that make the heterogeneity problem difficult to solve. The three problems are Semantic, Syntactic and Structural Heterogeneity. Conventional heterogeneous database integration schemes, like De-duplication Techniques, Data Warehouse, and Information Retrieval (IR) Search technique lack the capability to solve the integration of databases completely. The only reason is they cannot deal with Semantic heterogeneity problems efficiently. The semantic Web ontology model is experimented and discussed in the article, which is based on the query execution model. The ontology modeling is divided into two phases, initially to translate the database rules according to ontology rules to find an abstract ontology model. Secondly, to extend the abstract ontology model according to the databases. The method facilitates to apply similarly SPQRAL queries to search the data in the databases. Therefore, the Jena API is used to retrieve semantically similar records. The experiment is based on the two heterogeneous Universities Library Databases. The results show the effectiveness and scalability of the methodology.},
file = {C\:\\Users\\nhiot\\OneDrive\\zotero\\2020\\Asfand-E-Yar et Ali - 2020 - Semantic Integration of Heterogeneous Databases of.pdf;C\:\\Users\\nhiot\\Zotero\\storage\\WZ6IL6BD\\9072157.html}
325
+
}
326
+
312
327
@book{baderGraphPartitioningGraph2013,
313
328
title = {Graph {{Partitioning}} and {{Graph Clustering}}},
314
329
author = {Bader, David and Meyerhenke, Henning and Sanders, Peter and Wagner, Dorothea},
abstract = {SetUp (Schema Evolution Through UPdates) is a maintenance tool for RDF/S databases. Its main goal is to ensure validity when dealing with the evolution of an RDF/S knowledge graph. Such a graph represents a set of RDF (the instance) and RDFS (the schema) triples which respect semantic constraints.},
keywords = {⛔ No DOI found,apprentissage automatique,cas cliniques,CRF.,entit{\'e}s cliniques,entit{\'e}s imbriqu{\'e}es,extraction d'information fine,me,nosource},
2641
-
file = {C\:\\Users\\nhiot\\OneDrive\\zotero\\2020\\Minard et al. - 2020 - DOING@ DEFT cascade de CRF pour l'annotation d'en.pdf;C\:\\Users\\nhiot\\OneDrive\\zotero\\2020\\Minard et al. - 2020 - DOING@ DEFT cascade de CRF pour l'annotation d'en2.pdf;C\:\\Users\\nhiot\\OneDrive\\zotero\\2020\\Minard et al. - 2020 - DOING@ DEFT cascade de CRF pour l'annotation d'en3.pdf;C\:\\Users\\nhiot\\Zotero\\storage\\DY6IJYRR\\hal-02784743.html}
2659
+
file = {C\:\\Users\\nhiot\\OneDrive\\zotero\\2020\\Minard et al. - 2020 - DOING@ DEFT cascade de CRF pour l'annotation d'en3.pdf;C\:\\Users\\nhiot\\Zotero\\storage\\DY6IJYRR\\hal-02784743.html}
file = {C\:\\Users\\nhiot\\OneDrive\\zotero\\2019\\Strubell et al. - 2019 - Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning2.pdf;C\:\\Users\\nhiot\\Zotero\\storage\\IYNS5HUA\\1906.html}
booktitle = {Grammatical Inference: {{Algorithms}} and Applications. 9th International Colloquium, {{ICGI}} 2008 Saint-Malo, France, September 22-24, 2008 Proceedings},
0 commit comments