Skip to content

GT guidelines: implement and open for community contributions #226

@bertsky

Description

@bertsky

In their current form, the OCR-D transcription guidelines are often of little use to annotators looking for answers or guidance. They are written top-down intellectual accounts, but not formal (i.e. runnable/verifiable) and not searchable and – well, quite incomplete. Although many examples are given already, this is not nearly enough for the diverse set of materials and pecularities which annotators face (esp. those without a bibliological / humanities background).

How can we improve that?

I propose attacking this on multiple levels:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions