Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Costs of cyclic operation #72

Open
FraGard opened this issue May 22, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Costs of cyclic operation #72

FraGard opened this issue May 22, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@FraGard
Copy link
Contributor

FraGard commented May 22, 2021

For applications looking at the electricity system, it could be interesting to take into account the additional costs due to the cyclic operation of thermal power plants, to back up the increasing shares of variable renewables. Considering these could change the optimisation. Clearly, only an averaged and simplified representation of these costs can be given. I developed some code in my PhD thesis for this. Potentially of use?

@FraGard FraGard added the enhancement New feature or request label May 22, 2021
@tniet
Copy link
Contributor

tniet commented May 22, 2021

Hey @FraGard - interesting, for sure. It's definitely hard to get that cycling information from OSeMOSYS, though some of the storage equations from Welsch et al. might provide some methods for that. It's definitely worth posting that as a branch to GitHub (like the alternate storage code) but maybe not as a core component of OSeMOSYS? @willu47 @abhishek0208 - Thoughts?

@HauHe
Copy link
Contributor

HauHe commented May 24, 2021

Hi @FraGard , thanks for opening this issue and discussion.
I agree with @tniet, having these equations in the main code would be a bit of an overkill since it would make the code more complex but would still not provide the insights like UCM or similiar. However, having it in alternative version perhaps as Taco suggested in a branch would be interesting.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants