-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 419
docs: tw320-arbitrum-chain-increase-smart-contract-size-limit #2423
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
pete-vielhaber
commented
Jun 23, 2025
- Barebones structure with some basic information to get started
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
anegg0
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some nits, but the content is great!
...rbitrum-chain/02-configure-your-chain/common-configurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rbitrum-chain/02-configure-your-chain/common-configurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rbitrum-chain/02-configure-your-chain/common-configurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rbitrum-chain/02-configure-your-chain/common-configurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rbitrum-chain/02-configure-your-chain/common-configurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rbitrum-chain/02-configure-your-chain/common-configurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rbitrum-chain/02-configure-your-chain/common-configurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rbitrum-chain/02-configure-your-chain/common-configurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rbitrum-chain/02-configure-your-chain/common-configurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rbitrum-chain/02-configure-your-chain/common-configurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rbitrum-chain/02-configure-your-chain/common-configurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…igurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx Co-authored-by: Gaël Blanchemain <[email protected]>
…igurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx Co-authored-by: Gaël Blanchemain <[email protected]>
…igurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx Co-authored-by: Gaël Blanchemain <[email protected]>
…igurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx Co-authored-by: Gaël Blanchemain <[email protected]>
…igurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx Co-authored-by: Gaël Blanchemain <[email protected]>
…igurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx Co-authored-by: Gaël Blanchemain <[email protected]>
…igurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx Co-authored-by: Gaël Blanchemain <[email protected]>
…igurations/11-smart-contract-size-limit.mdx Co-authored-by: Gaël Blanchemain <[email protected]>
| ## Pros of increasing the smart contract size limit | ||
|
|
||
| - **Enables more complex and feature-rich contracts**: Developers can include additional logic, libraries, or functionalities in a single contract without needing to split them into multiple smaller ones, which simplifies development and reduces overhead from inter-contract calls. | ||
| - **Reduces reliance on workarounds**: Avoids patterns like proxies (e.g., delegatecall) or the Diamond Standard, which add complexity, potential security risks (e.g., new attack vectors), and gas inefficiencies. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not believe the pattern of proxy contracts would be removed if we increase the contract size limit. A big reason proxies exist is for the ability to upgrade smart contracts. And to my knowledge that can only be done on chain via proxy contracts so that pattern is here to stay for major security reasons of course