Skip to content

vocabulary parameter not needed for taxonomy searches #16

@MikeThacker1

Description

@MikeThacker1

We have previously suggested that API searches for services matching a taxonomy term should take this syntax:

/services/?&taxonomy_id=esdServiceType:242&vocabulary=esdServiceTypes

However, API guidance now makes it clear how CURIEs should be used for all taxonomy term identifiers. So we expect taxonomy identifiers to be unique across all vocabularies.

Hence the "vocabulary" parameter should not be needed and this syntax should be sufficient:

/services/?&taxonomy_id=esdServiceType:242

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions