Use std::stack for xr_stack

There's no difference basically..

Author: Xottab-DUTY

src/xrCommon/xr_stack.h

@@ -1,39 +1,8 @@
 #pragma once
+#include <stack>
 #include "xr_vector.h"
-//#include <stack>
 
-// XXX: Use standard implementation?
-//template <typename T, class container = xr_vector<T>>
-//using xr_stack = std::stack<T, container>;
-
-// XXX: Use profiler or something to know if this is faster than std::stack
-template <typename _Ty, class _C = xr_vector<_Ty>>
-class xr_stack
-{
-public:
-    using allocator_type = typename _C::allocator_type;
-    using value_type = typename allocator_type::value_type;
-    using size_type = typename allocator_type::size_type;
-    using _Myt = xr_stack<_Ty, _C>;
-
-    allocator_type get_allocator() const { return c.get_allocator(); }
-    bool empty() const { return c.empty(); }
-    size_type size() const { return c.size(); }
-    value_type& top() { return c.back(); }
-    const value_type& top() const { return c.back(); }
-    void emplace(value_type&& _X) { c.emplace_back(_X); }
-    void push(value_type&& _X) { c.push_back(std::move(_X)); }
-    void push(const value_type& _X) { c.push_back(_X); }
-    void pop() { c.pop_back(); }
-    bool operator==(const _Myt& _X) const { return c == _X.c; }
-    bool operator!=(const _Myt& _X) const { return !(*this == _X); }
-    bool operator<(const _Myt& _X) const { return c < _X.c; }
-    bool operator>(const _Myt& _X) const { return _X < *this; }
-    bool operator<=(const _Myt& _X) const { return !(_X < *this); }
-    bool operator>=(const _Myt& _X) const { return !(*this < _X); }
-
-protected:
-    _C c;
-};
+template <typename T, class container = xr_vector<T>>
+using xr_stack = std::stack<T, container>;
 
 #define DEFINE_STACK(T, N) using N = xr_stack<T>;