You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi devs and community, I've followed the example files on fine-tuning and tinkered with some of the hyperparameters, but my observation is that fine-tuning on ~2k materials science data (or a subset of it for cross-validation) led to comparable performance with the pre-trained models. I am wondering generally, is this expected, or are there some key parameters I am supposed to explore? Does it also makes sense to fine-tune and then perform ICL on the same dataset when using it later? Appreciate your advice on the best practices for fine-tuning. Many thanks in advanced!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi devs and community, I've followed the example files on fine-tuning and tinkered with some of the hyperparameters, but my observation is that fine-tuning on ~2k materials science data (or a subset of it for cross-validation) led to comparable performance with the pre-trained models. I am wondering generally, is this expected, or are there some key parameters I am supposed to explore? Does it also makes sense to fine-tune and then perform ICL on the same dataset when using it later? Appreciate your advice on the best practices for fine-tuning. Many thanks in advanced!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions