Skip to content

Discussion pages for WIS3 topics #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
kshemendrapaul opened this issue Mar 24, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Discussion pages for WIS3 topics #2

kshemendrapaul opened this issue Mar 24, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@kshemendrapaul
Copy link

Should we add pages or link to existing online forums being used, for communities of interest and communities of practices that are coming together at WIS3?

For example, for the NJ ISE or link to the existing cyber threat modeling online community?
MEKennedy79 added a commit to MEKennedy79/project-interoperability.github.io that referenced this issue Mar 25, 2014
@MEKennedy79
In #Project-Interoperability#2 delete "most important"
416ecaf 
Reads better. Having "top" and "most import" is like having an "ample sufficiency" or "surperflous redundency". Kind of repeats itself and both are not needed.
@MEKennedy79
Copy link
Contributor

Adding links would be a good idea. Allows the reader to immediately reference a community of practice or interest depending upon the thread. Adding pages might be a bit cumbersome for layout though.

leahbannon added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 25, 2014
@leahbannon
Merge pull request #4 from MEKennedy79/patch-1
49c2a47 
In ##2 delete "most important"
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 28, 2014

Agreed. It might also be worth considering establishing a COE (Center of Excellence) from this site to house the best practices that rise to the top as a result of active feedback and collaboration and applicable across all or most domains.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@kshemendrapaul @MEKennedy79