Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

lost of implementation is too specific in #333 #338

Open
Roger-luo opened this issue Feb 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

lost of implementation is too specific in #333 #338

Roger-luo opened this issue Feb 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@GiggleLiu

Comments

@Roger-luo
Copy link
Member

currently the generic implementation is replaced by specialized methods on BatchedArrayReg and ArrayReg which causing other register type inherited AbstractRegister not working anymore on functions like expect
@GiggleLiu
Copy link
Member

Do you have any MWE? I want to check if it has been fixed by #411

@Roger-luo
Copy link
Member Author

Let me check, I think I opened this issue was because of the SubspaceArrayReg in Bloqade, not sure it's fixed now or not

@GiggleLiu GiggleLiu mentioned this issue Oct 30, 2022
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@GiggleLiu GiggleLiu

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@GiggleLiu @Roger-luo