-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GoPro Dataset Inconsistencies #65
Comments
Hi @shekshaa The links are here (same as the public ones): Best, |
Previously, I downloaded the data on the first week of this August. Now, I use your link to download GOPRO_Large_all and it seems there is still misalignment, namely I loaded
The first and second prints return |
Hi @SeungjunNah, Is there any update on this? This issue is hindering comparison with previous work which are trained on inconsistent data. |
@shekshaa
import imageio
import numpy
img1 = imageio.imread('000047.png').astype(np.float32)
img2 = imageio.imread('000326.png').astype(np.float32)
diff = np.abs(img1 - img2).sum()
print(diff)
|
Strange! I just redowloaded the data (both GOPRO_Large and GOPRO_Large_all), ran exactly the above code you have shared, but obtained a non-zero value! I suspect that your data might be different from the one you shared here: https://seungjunnah.github.io/Datasets/gopro |
Did you try the data on Google Drive? |
No. As I am downloading data within another server which has banned google drive, I used SNU server links. Do you mean that the one in SNU is not the same as the one in google drive? |
Hi,
First of all, thank you for this great work!
I have downloaded both versions of GoPro dataset: GOPRO_Large and GOPRO_Large_all. I see following inconsistencies:
GOPRO_Large_all
and compare it with the correspond sharp image provided inGOPRO_Large
, I see that they are different, although their difference is less than 1 at gray-level. For instance, I expected thatGOPRO_Large/train/GOPR0372_07_00/sharp/000047.png
be equal toGOPRO_Large_all/train/GOPR0372_07_00/000326.png
(the middle frame in the sequence from 000323.png to 00329.png), but it was not the case.GOPRO_Large_all
, the result is close but does not exactly match the corresponding image inblur_gamma
. The steps I take are as follows:pow(img, 2.2)
)pow(img, 1/2.2)
)I was wondering whether you took same steps to generate blurry images (I suspect that you have used ffmpeg to obtain blurry frames of the video). Also, I would appreciate it if you elaborate on the discrepancy between the sharp frames of two versions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: