We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
$ cabal build ... Build profile: -w ghc-9.4.4 -O1 ... Building library for type-operators-0.2.0.0.. [1 of 1] Compiling Control.Type.Operator ( Control/Type/Operator.hs, /Users/abel/tmp/type-operators-0.2.0.0/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-osx/ghc-9.4.4/type-operators-0.2.0.0/build/Control/Type/Operator.o, /Users/abel/tmp/type-operators-0.2.0.0/dist-newstyle/build/x86_64-osx/ghc-9.4.4/type-operators-0.2.0.0/build/Control/Type/Operator.dyn_o ) Control/Type/Operator.hs:97:15: error: Conflicting family instance declarations: [] <+> _ = () :: Constraint -- Defined at Control/Type/Operator.hs:97:15 forall {k} {c :: k -> Constraint} {a :: k} {as :: [k]}. c <+> (a : as) = (c a, c <+> as) -- Defined at Control/Type/Operator.hs:99:15 | 97 | type instance (<+>) [] _ = (() :: Constraint) | ^^^^^
Lifted from:
In my role as Hackage Trustee, I restricted base to <4.17 on hackage: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/type-operators-0.2.0.0/revisions/
base
<4.17
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Lifted from:
In my role as Hackage Trustee, I restricted
base
to<4.17
on hackage: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/type-operators-0.2.0.0/revisions/The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: