Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Radiated energy calculations with Urad #790

Open
jjl364 opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Radiated energy calculations with Urad #790

jjl364 opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@jjl364
Copy link

jjl364 commented Feb 5, 2025

Description

I am using the non-linear Compton model in SMILEI to determine the yield of photon radiation in a laser-plasma interaction. I only have one species (electrons) that are allowed to radiate, and I have been tracking the total radiated energy using the U_rad parameter from the scalar file.

I am finding that this U_rad number is underestimating the actual radiation energy by a significant margin. The discrepancy grows when the total laser energy increases. I get the numbers I expect by manually integrating the photon spectra for each output of photon RAW particles. Manual integration still might lose some photons that are created and lost to simulation walls in-between outputs, but it does set a lower bound for conversion efficiency and is much higher than U_rad suggests. Is there an easy fix for this?

Thanks for the help!

Image

Parameters

  • Smilei version 5.0
  • Input file & command script - attached
  • Computing resources
    • C++ compiler 10.3.1
    • MPI version 2021.6.0
    • HDF5 version 1.14.0
    • Python version 3.9.12
@jjl364 jjl364 added the bug label Feb 5, 2025
@mccoys
Copy link
Contributor

mccoys commented Feb 8, 2025

I think this is a question for @MickaelGrechX ?

@MickaelGrechX
Copy link

I'm surprised.
Can you please provide the input file and post-processing scripts you are using?
You mentioned they are attached but I can't find them!

@jjl364
Copy link
Author

jjl364 commented Feb 12, 2025 via email

@mccoys
Copy link
Contributor

mccoys commented Feb 14, 2025

Please reply on the github website. Not from your email. Attachments won't work

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants