Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Getting Started with Iceberg Tables - Error/Bug at Step 6 #1923

Open
sfc-gh-mquarfot opened this issue Mar 11, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Getting Started with Iceberg Tables - Error/Bug at Step 6 #1923

sfc-gh-mquarfot opened this issue Mar 11, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@sfc-gh-mquarfot
Copy link

Describe the bug
At the "Create and Outbound Share" step within Step 6 of this Quickstart, the instructions say to grant the iceberg_lab role permissions to create a share. This doesn't allow that role to actually fully execute the Share to make it available to another account.

URL of where you see the bug
https://quickstarts.snowflake.com/guide/getting_started_iceberg_tables/index.html?index=..%2F..index#5:~:text=Create%20an%20Outbound%20Share

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Complete the Quickstart through Step 5 (Processing Iceberg Tables with Snowpark)
  2. Move on to Step 6 (Sharing Iceberg Tables)
  3. Try to complete the "Create an Outbound Share" step as instructed. You will get an insufficient privileges error when using the iceberg_lab role.

Expected behavior
Based on the instructions, the iceberg_lab role should be able to fully create a share with a secondary/reader account, but the privileges are insufficient, so you have to use the accountadmin role to move forward.

Screenshots

Image Image Image

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: macOS 15.3.1
  • Browser: Prisma
  • Version: 134.7.4.44

Additional context
The image in the Quickstart actually shows the user sharing the Share as accountadmin

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant